IAC Home CEERE Home

ELECTRIC MOTOR SYSTEMS



     In industrial and commercial facilities, motor driven systems are responsible for as much as 70 percent of a building's electricity consumption.  For some industries, such as pulp and paper or textiles, motor system electricity consumption can reach 90 percent of the industry's total use.
    Motors can consume excess amounts of energy if they are improperly mounted, if they are not connected to their load, or in the case of three phase motors,  if the voltages of the opposing leads are different. Manufacturers of three phase motors recommend that they should not be operated when this imbalance (of the opposing leads) is greater than 1%.  Bearing wear can also contribute a motor's reduction in efficiency.
    Energy efficient motor systems can decrease energy costs while improving operating costs and reducing equipment maintenance. The following recommendations provide an insight to the potential energy and monetary savings that can be achieved.



General Rules of Thumb:
  • The average cost of electricity is $0.05/kWh ($15/MMBtu)
  • There are 2000 hours per year per shift (based on the assumption that one shift is 8 hours per day, 5 days per week, 50 weeks per year)
  • Upgrading to an energy efficient motor can result in savings of about 5% over the operating costs of a standard motor.
  • A typical standard motor has an efficiency of 90 %.(See table below for horsepower ratings and nominal efficiencies)
  • The cost of operating a typical heavy industrial motor is:  $62/hp/shift/year
     Notes:
                    Before choosing the following targeted recommendations READ THE FOLLOWING:
    Pay back estimates for the following recommendations will use the equation below.  They will vary depending on the, application, type of installation, and purchase quantity of material and labor associated with each recommendation.  It will be up to the person doing the analyses to use the URL references below each equation to help estimate an implementation cost.

    The data correlating to the variables below each equation will be prompted for in order to execute a calculation.  Frequently the fuel cost (FC) associated with the specific recommendation will be prompted for in order to calculate the annual cost savings (ACS). Unless otherwise specific to a particular recommendation the ACS will be calculated as follows:
 


 

HORSEPOWER vs. EFFICIENCY

------------------ --------------Base Speed------------- ---------------------
HP 3600 RPM 1800 RPM 1200 RPM
1 75.5 82.5 80.0
1.5 82.5 84.0 85.5
2 84.0 84.0 86.5
3 85.5 87.5 87.5
5 87.5 87.5 87.5
7.5 88.5 89.5 89.5
10 89.5 89.5 89.5
15 90.2 91.0 90.2
20 90.2 91.0 90.2
25 91.0 92.4 91.7
30 91.0 92.4 91.7
40 91.7 93.0 93.0
50 92.4 93.0 93.0
60 93.0 93.6 93.6
75 93.0 94.1 93.6
100 93.6 94.5 94.1
125 94.5 94.5 94.1
150 94.5 95.0 95.0
200 95.0 95.0 95.0
AVE. 36 HP 89.6 91.0 90.0

  1. Optimize motor size with load; size motors for peak operating efficiency.
  2. Use multiple speed motors or variable speed drives for variable pump, blower and compressor loads.
  3. Replace existing motors with energy efficient motors.
  4. Improve lubrication practices for motor driven equipment.
  5. Install Energy Efficient V-Belts on motor driven equipment.


1.  Optimize motor size with load; size motors for peak operating efficiency.
    All motors run more efficiently at full load than at part load; most motors operate near peak efficiency from 75% to 110% of their rated load.  To obtain optimal  power use motors should be operated within this range.  The following equation illustrates the savings obtained when a motor or motor driven equipment is retrofitted for peak efficiency.

Power Engineering Books
Thomas Register

HP = average horse power of motor(s)
CON = conversion factor, 0.7465 KW/hp
LF = load factor (i.e. the approximate percentage of time the motor is fully loaded)
HY = operating hours per year
hc = efficiency of current motor*
hp = efficiency of proposed motor*

*Note, when considering multiple motors, the efficiencies should be the same to obtain an accurate estimation of the savings that can be achieved

Motor efficiency table
Data Conversions?
RPN Calculator?

Press the calculate button to execute an estimation


BACK TO FRONT PAGE


2.  Use multiple speed motors or variable speed drives (VSD) for variable pump, blower and compressor loads.
      A variable or adjustable speed drive (ASD or VSD) will reduce the speed of a motor by adjusting the frequency, voltage, or current of the motor input so that the motor performance just matches the present load.  The speed of AC motors is proportional to the frequency of the power supply.  AC adjustable drives convert 3 phase 60 Hz to an adjustable frequency and voltage source for controlling the speed of AC squirrel cage induction motors.  Moreover, VSD's or ASD's control motor speed by synthesizing the voltage and frequency of power supplied to the motor so that it runs only as fast as necessary to do the work required at a given time during operation.  VSD's or ASD's can control speed over a wide range, from 0 to 300% of the rated speed.  There are four basic types:  1.  Inverter based, 2. Cyclo-inverters,3. Wound-rotor slip recovery, and 4.  Voltage-level controls.  ASD's and VSD's can provide accurate process control, and match the speed of  a motor driven device to varying load requirements.  The following equation (for one motor at a time) can be used to determine the savings that can be achieved when a VSD or ASD is implemented.

Power Engineering Books
NEMA
Thomas Register

HP1 = current motor horsepower (if multiple motors are considered, the efficiencies and loads must be the same, otherwise the analysis must be done on an individual basis)
HP2 = anticipated effective motor horsepower
CON = conversion factor, 0.7465 KW/hp
HY = operating hours per year
LF = load factor of equipment using motor
h = motor efficiency

Motor efficiency table
Data Conversions?
RPN Calculator?

Press the calculate button to execute an estimation

    For machines which have a free discharge the following relation should be used:

Q1 is current volume of flow, CFM
Q2 is anticipated volume of flow, CFM

NOTE:  Both Q1 and Q2 must have the same units

If a static head is present, precise knowledge of the pump and the system curves is required to calculate the reduced horsepower.

Motor efficiency table
Data Conversions?
RPN Calculator?

Press the calculate button to execute an estimation


BACK TO FRONT PAGE


3.  Replace existing motors with energy efficient motors.
           Motor losses occur from five major areas:  core losses, stator losses, rotor losses, stray load losses, winding losses, and friction. High efficiency motors are designed to reduce these losses by about 2 to 10 percent. For the motor size range of (7.5 to 125 hp), the losses are likely to be in the range of about of 2 to 7 percent. In addition to having lower losses, high efficiency motors also have higher power factors during operation. Cost premiums for high efficiency motors range from 10 to 25 percent, since an average motor uses 75 times its initial cost in electrical energy over its lifetime, there is great savings potential which is illustrated in the following equation.
 

Power Engineering Books
NEMA
Thomas Register

Note:  the above equation is used for an individual motor.

HP = required motor horsepower
LF = load factor (i.e. the approximate fraction of time the motor is fully loaded)
CON = conversion factor, 0.7465 KW/hp
HY = operating hours per year
h1 = current motor efficiency
h2 = anticipated motor efficiency

Motor efficiency table
Data Conversions?
RPN Calculator?

Press the calculate button to execute an estimation


BACK TO FRONT PAGE


4.  Improve lubrication practices for motor driven equipment.
         Replace oil in gear motors with synthetic oil to reduce friction losses. One manufacturer of synthetic oil claims a 5-10% decrease in average power consumption of gear motors when their product is used;  this is due to the high viscosity of the oil, resulting in less power loss in the gears.  The following equation shows the savings potential that can be obtained.

Power Engineering Books
NEMA
Thomas Register

HP = horse power of motor driven equipment (for individual motors systems or multiple systems with identical efficiencies and loads)
PS = fractional savings due to synthetic oil (enter as a decimal value)
LF = load factor (i.e. the approximate fraction of time the motor is fully loaded)
CON = conversion factor, 0.7465 KW/hp
HY = operating hours per year
h = efficiency of motor(s)

Motor efficiency table
Data Conversions?
RPN Calculator?

Press the calculate button to execute an estimation


BACK TO FRONT PAGE


5.  Install Energy Efficient V-Belts
    Replace old power transmission belts with energy efficient ones to reduce power transmission losses.  The cogged V-belt is a direct replacement for a conventional V-belt.  Cogged V-belts depend on friction to transmit power and thus use the same pulleys as the standard V.  They have slots perpendicular to the belt length that reduce the belt's bending resistance, cogged belts bend more easily and exhibit reduced bending losses.  Typically, cogged belt efficiency is about 2% higher than that of standard belts.  Cogged belts also run cooler because of their lower energy absorption, and last 20-30 percent longer than standard V-belts.  The following equation shows the savings that can be obtained with a V-belt retrofit.

Power Engineering Books
NEMA
Thomas Register

HP = total belt driven horsepower (for individual motors systems or multiple systems with identical efficiencies and loads)
PS = power savings (manufacturer estimate 0.02) due to installation of cogged V-belts
LF = load factor (i.e. the average fraction of time the motor is fully loaded)
CON = conversion factor, 0.7465 KW/hp
HY = operating hours per year
h = efficiency

Motor efficiency table
Data Conversions?
RPN Calculator?

Press the calculate button to execute an estimation


BACK TO FRONT PAGE

 
Engineering Home